In this user guide, we describe some of the possible causes that can lead to the dcdiag ldap 58 error, and then I suggest some possible solutions that you can try to solve this problem.
Need to fix Windows errors? ASR Pro can help
We are your own Active Directory domain running DC 2003 SP1 jog on behalf of GCS
and DC 2000 sp4 as a secondary DC/DNS server. ADS was built in mixed style
I just noticed a few bugs in the 2000 DC Viewer that seem to indicate this
The computer object for this PC could not be found. I’ll try next time
The File Replication Service has enabled replication beyond DC 1 on the DC pair for
The DNS server failed to enumerate the zone service directories
OUR DOMAIN. This DNS server is designed to use information from
Active Directory for this zone and cannot load it into the zone.
0000: 2a 23 00 00 *#..
From my research, DC 2000 (#2) considers this task to be SOA
DNS for, but DC 2003 (#1) also considers the following to be used for SOA DNS. If I
tried to update SOA manually, everything reverts back to original a
When I ran DCDIAG on a 2000 domain controller (#2), I got the following errors:
Warning. DC01 was the owner of the schema, but is not actually responding to the DS RPC Bind.
Pre warning. DC01 is the owner schema, but is not expected to respond to LDAP Bind.DC01
Attention! Is the owner of the domain, but is almost certainly not responding to the DS RPC Bind.
Warning: DC01 owns the domain but is not responding to an ldap bind.
Warning: DC01 is the owner of the PDC, except that it does not respond to RPC nintendo ds lite bind.
Warning. DC01 is the owner of the PDC but is not responding to the LDAP bind.
Warning. DC01 is the owner of the read but is not responding to the DS RPC bind.
Warning. DC01 is the owner of the read, but it’s not the best LDAP binding.
Attention! DC01 has Infrastructure Update but no
Warning. DC01 is updating infrastructure but not responding
Domain security and logins are unquestionably unaffected, but security
I ran into this type of problem after trying to install SQL MSDE on DC 2000 for
Can anyone point me in the right direction to solve some problems?
Besides this name, DC1’s test link seems to have a lot of problems
Message from Jeff
We are using an Active Directory domain with DC 2004 SP1 as GCS
And a DC 2000 SP4 as a secondary DC/DNS server. ADS was based on a mixed format
I’ve noticed an event that some DC 2000 Viewer Errors are pointing to
The electronic element for this computer could not be found. Could you try again next time?
The File Replication Service has enabled replication from DC to DC 2 for you
DNS hosting failed to complete listing the zone service website directory
OUR DOMAIN. This DNS server is configured to process information received from
Active Directory for idea zone and can’t load zone without it.
0000: 2a twenty 00 00 *#..
When I researched, DC 2000 (#2) sounded like it was my SOA
DNS for, but DC 2003 (#1) also considers SOA DNS for. If I
tried to update SOA manually, remember it reverts back to original shortly after update
Warning. DC01 owns the schema but is not responding to DS Bind rpc.
Warning. DC01 is a proprietary schema but does not respond to LDAP Bind.DC01
Warning. Is the owner of the domain, but does not respond toto the DS-RPC binder.
Attention! DC01 is our own domain owner, but you don’t need to bind LDAP.
Warning. DC01 is the primary owner of the PDC, but does not respond to RPC ds Bind.
Warning. DC01 is definitely the owner of the PDC, but will not respond to an LDAP bind.
Warning. DC01 will take ownership of the disk, but will not respond to DS RPC bind.
Warning. DC01 is the owner of rid, but did not respond to the LDAP bind.
Warning. DC01 owns infrastructure update but may not respond to it
Warning: DC01 must be the owner of the infrastructure update, sorry for not replying
Security and domain logon are not affected, and some security elements
This problem occurred after trying to install SQL MSDE on most 2000 DCs
Can anyone personally point me in the right direction to solve this particular problem?
Thanks for the reply, I hope the client checks again. Here is the result
It looks like it passed most of the tests required to become one of the main domains
Management. Do you think it has something to do with security/communications?
between two domain controllers? (i.e. 2k3 has a more secure connection than w2k
not compatible with?) Remember I configured and created a security theme
Of course, they were in a very good position to communicate, but I certainly could have missed something. From
after chris3 [MVP]
There seems to be a problem between the DC1 test link and the nameProtect your computer from harmful viruses and malware with this software download.
Dcdiag Ldap Fel 58
Dcdiag Ldap Fehler 58
Dcdiag Blad Ldap 58
Dcdiag Ldap Fout 58
Dcdiag Ldap Erreur 58
Errore Dcdiag Ldap 58
Error 58 De Ldap Dcdiag
Erro Dcdiag Ldap 58
Dcdiag Oshibka Ldap 58
Dcdiag Ldap 오류 58